Key Findings
Mirror therapy alone showed better results in acute and chronic stroke patients in upper limb functioning than either conventional rehabilitation or a combination of conventional rehabilitation plus mirror therapy. The effectiveness of MT rehabilitation can be combined with others treatments (OT, PT, etc.).
References
Pérez‐Cruzado, D., Merchán‐Baeza, J. A., González‐Sánchez, M., & Cuesta‐Vargas, A. I. (2017). Systematic review of mirror therapy compared with conventional rehabilitation in upper extremity function in stroke survivors. Australian occupational therapy journal, 64(2), 91-112.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12342
More EBP
| Population | Adults |
| Condition | Stroke |
| Intervention | Mirror Therapy |
| Variables | Upper Extremity Function, ADLs, Quality of Life (QoL) |
| Measures | Grip strength, ROM, Spasticity, Dexterity |
| Evidence | Green – Go |
| Methods | Systematic Review |
- Green evidence (Go) – high-quality evidence indicating effectiveness.
- Yellow evidence (Caution/Measure) – insufficient evidence exists.
- Red evidence (Stop) – high-quality evidence indicating ineffectiveness.
Keywords
Disclaimer:
Before implementing any new intervention with a client, occupational therapy practitioners should be aware of the potential benefits, risks, and harms of the intervention. Occupational therapy practitioners should exercise professional reasoning based on the client’s particular strengths and limitations before providing any intervention. Professional reasoning and judgment is also required when choosing which intervention protocols are feasible for their clients.
All information provided is for educational purposes only and must never be considered a substitute for medical advice provided by a physician or other qualified healthcare professional. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health professional with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Our content does not replace the relationship between your physician or any other qualified health professional.
Evidence-Based OT does not make any warranty or guarantees with respect to the accuracy, applicability or completeness of accessible content. Under no circumstances will Evidence-Based OT be responsible or liable in any way for any content, including but not limited to any errors or omissions in the content or for any direct, indirect incidental or punitive damages arising out of access to or use of any content made available.